Ouroboros is hosting the latest brain/mind Encephalon carnival. Damaged learning, former voodoo, informed consent, emotional expressions, and bad moods… Enough to make your mind run in circles.
|queen size air mattr… on Testosterone and cortisol expl…|
|Stephanie on Cosleeping and Biological Impe…|
|Do Videogames Make u… on Psychopathy: Is It In You…|
|Bioidentical Testost… on Testosterone and cortisol expl…|
|11 Cutting-Edge Thin… on We hate memes, pass it on…|
|Giving names to arom… on We agree it’s WEIRD, but…|
|Around the Web | Sav… on Anthropology Round Up|
|motherwitdoula on Cosleeping and Biological Impe…|
|Braindance Community… on Brain, Dance and Culture|
|Could Your Shoes be… on Lose your shoes: Is barefoot…|
Posted by gregdowney on April 14, 2009
When I was a lifeguard in high school, two of my fellow lifeguards — Steve and Pete — sought to converse as much as possible quoting directly lines from the Chevy Chase movie, Fletch. This is what qualified as comedy. Steve was apparently the ‘more clever’ of the two as he probably achieved Fletch Quotation Ratios as high as 20%; Pete, though quite well tanned, likely only managed 10% FQR at best. I hadn’t seen the movie, and I was never much for quoting film scripts (not even Monty Python), so I assumed that Steve’s high FQR was either a symptom of premature senility or a sign of the impending collapse of Western civilization.
Recent fears about the negative cognitive consequences of the social networking site Twitter, which I mentioned in an earlier post, Is Facebook rotting our children’s brains?, led me to recall Steve and Pete’s battle for high FQR. In both cases, concerned observers might wonder whether patterns of mental activity can lead to long-term neural degeneration; I haven’t checked in on Steve or Pete in more than 20 years, but I suspect they’re both locked in institutions living out a cruel Chevy Chase imitation from which they can no longer escape.
Twitter, even more than other Internet-based social networking applications, seems to provoke apocalyptic fears of mass mental degradation. Over at Alternet, for example, Alexander Zaitchik asked Twitter Nation Has Arrived: How Scared Should We Be? In the piece, Zaitchik wonders whether what was ‘once an easily avoided subculture of needy and annoying online souls’ was bringing about the apotheosis of all that is loathsome in American pop culture: ‘look-at-me adolescent neediness, constant-contact media addiction, birdlike attention-span compression and vapidity to the point of depravity.’ Rob Horning of Pop Matters warns about ‘Twitterification’ in a piece titled, Foucault’s Facebook. Keith Olbermann named Twitter ‘worst person in the world,’ …for the one episode at least (see video at You Tube); Olbermann found someone already Twittering in his name, even using his email address. And if you’re not already convinced that Twitter is the unmentioned fifth Horseman of the Apocalypse, John Mayer’s Twitter obsession is blamed for Jennifer Aniston pulling the pin on their relationship.
Fortunately, even if we are on the non-stop plane to cognitive Armageddon, Web 2.0 assures us that we will have clever guerilla videos about our own immanent destruction as our in-flight entertainment. From SuperNews, we have a helpful cartoon, ‘The Twouble with Twitters’, to explain to us ‘the latest socially networking micro-bloggy thingy,’ especially if you’re a slow-on-the-uptake parent not sufficiently worried about adolescent technology use (are there any?).
More after the jump…
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in general, Learning, Psychological anthropology, Technology | Tagged: cognitive development, communication technology, culture and cognition, Internet, social networking, Susan Greenfield, technophobia, Twitter | 14 Comments »