<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My genome is not my self</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neuroanthropology.net/2009/01/16/my-genome-is-not-my-self/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neuroanthropology.net/2009/01/16/my-genome-is-not-my-self/</link>
	<description>For a greater understanding of the encultured brain and body...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 14:29:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Grobstein</title>
		<link>http://neuroanthropology.net/2009/01/16/my-genome-is-not-my-self/#comment-4527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Grobstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neuroanthropology.net/?p=2339#comment-4527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was glad to see Pinker include genes, environment, AND chance in his catalogue of influences but also struck by his off-handed dismissal of a fourth influence that I would include: &quot;free will, whatever that means.&quot;  See &lt;a href=&quot;http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/3720&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Self: Genes, Environment, Chance, and ... Free Will&lt;/a&gt; for more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was glad to see Pinker include genes, environment, AND chance in his catalogue of influences but also struck by his off-handed dismissal of a fourth influence that I would include: &#8220;free will, whatever that means.&#8221;  See <a href="http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/3720" rel="nofollow">The Self: Genes, Environment, Chance, and &#8230; Free Will</a> for more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjørn Østman</title>
		<link>http://neuroanthropology.net/2009/01/16/my-genome-is-not-my-self/#comment-4426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bjørn Østman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neuroanthropology.net/?p=2339#comment-4426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurospektic, I would think that finding out that you are in a certain way (say, overly shy) in large part because of a certain allele (or set of several) would change the way you look at yourself. Understanding fosters acceptance, I should think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neurospektic, I would think that finding out that you are in a certain way (say, overly shy) in large part because of a certain allele (or set of several) would change the way you look at yourself. Understanding fosters acceptance, I should think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neuroskeptic</title>
		<link>http://neuroanthropology.net/2009/01/16/my-genome-is-not-my-self/#comment-4420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neuroskeptic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neuroanthropology.net/?p=2339#comment-4420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s two seperate issues here -

First is whether genes are important determinants of behaviour, and I think they are. More importantly I think it&#039;s silly to see human life as a tug of war between genes and environment (and the study of human life as a tug of war between geneticists and social scientists!).

The second issue though is whether knowing your DNA will alter your understanding of &quot;yourself&quot;. I think the answer here is almost certainly not because if you have a genetic variant which makes you, say, shy, then you already know about it - you&#039;ll know that you&#039;re shy. And so on. Or if you don&#039;t know that you&#039;re unusually shy, you&#039;re not going to find out by looking at some DNA, but by interacting with other people, or through therapy, or whatever. And indeed most people who are, say, shy, already (implicitly) attribute this to their biology in that they see it as something they were &quot;just born with&quot;.

So in that respect I can&#039;t see how finding out your DNA is going to alter your self-concept at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s two seperate issues here -</p>
<p>First is whether genes are important determinants of behaviour, and I think they are. More importantly I think it&#8217;s silly to see human life as a tug of war between genes and environment (and the study of human life as a tug of war between geneticists and social scientists!).</p>
<p>The second issue though is whether knowing your DNA will alter your understanding of &#8220;yourself&#8221;. I think the answer here is almost certainly not because if you have a genetic variant which makes you, say, shy, then you already know about it &#8211; you&#8217;ll know that you&#8217;re shy. And so on. Or if you don&#8217;t know that you&#8217;re unusually shy, you&#8217;re not going to find out by looking at some DNA, but by interacting with other people, or through therapy, or whatever. And indeed most people who are, say, shy, already (implicitly) attribute this to their biology in that they see it as something they were &#8220;just born with&#8221;.</p>
<p>So in that respect I can&#8217;t see how finding out your DNA is going to alter your self-concept at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: originsg</title>
		<link>http://neuroanthropology.net/2009/01/16/my-genome-is-not-my-self/#comment-4416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[originsg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neuroanthropology.net/?p=2339#comment-4416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed !  As un-actionable as the new genetic data is, its still a lot of fun to explore one&#039;s own genome with respect to the existing data.  Seems to be a sort of interesting jumping-off point for personal and inter-personal reflection. Love your blog !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed !  As un-actionable as the new genetic data is, its still a lot of fun to explore one&#8217;s own genome with respect to the existing data.  Seems to be a sort of interesting jumping-off point for personal and inter-personal reflection. Love your blog !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

