<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Encultured Brain &#8211; Part Two on the San Francisco AAA Conference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/12/07/the-encultured-brain-part-two-on-the-san-francisco-aaa-conference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/12/07/the-encultured-brain-part-two-on-the-san-francisco-aaa-conference/</link>
	<description>For a greater understanding of the encultured brain and body...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 14:29:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The gendered brain and the classed brain &#8211; mutually occluded</title>
		<link>http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/12/07/the-encultured-brain-part-two-on-the-san-francisco-aaa-conference/#comment-3829</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The gendered brain and the classed brain &#8211; mutually occluded]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 22:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neuroanthropology.net/?p=1963#comment-3829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] are, it seems, two kinds of brains. The brain that&#8217;s cultured and the brain that&#8217;s innate. Which one of the two will be used to ground a newly given fact [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are, it seems, two kinds of brains. The brain that&#8217;s cultured and the brain that&#8217;s innate. Which one of the two will be used to ground a newly given fact [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Devijver</title>
		<link>http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/12/07/the-encultured-brain-part-two-on-the-san-francisco-aaa-conference/#comment-3819</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Devijver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neuroanthropology.net/?p=1963#comment-3819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, this post has blown me away. I&#039;m all for lights, camera, action in anthropology. What strikes me is how the berth of anthropology is becoming wider and wider which I think is a good thing.

I first become interested in anthropology after watching Micheal Wesch &quot;An Anthropological Introduction to YouTube&quot;. Since then I&#039;ve been following anthropological blogs like yours and I&#039;m very happy with what I&#039;m reading. I think humanity will be better off when we have a better understanding of two things: 1) how or mind works, and 2) how relationships work. I think the Encultured Brain takes us one step closer to that reality.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts, it&#039;s a pleasure to read your blog.

Steven]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this post has blown me away. I&#8217;m all for lights, camera, action in anthropology. What strikes me is how the berth of anthropology is becoming wider and wider which I think is a good thing.</p>
<p>I first become interested in anthropology after watching Micheal Wesch &#8220;An Anthropological Introduction to YouTube&#8221;. Since then I&#8217;ve been following anthropological blogs like yours and I&#8217;m very happy with what I&#8217;m reading. I think humanity will be better off when we have a better understanding of two things: 1) how or mind works, and 2) how relationships work. I think the Encultured Brain takes us one step closer to that reality.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing your thoughts, it&#8217;s a pleasure to read your blog.</p>
<p>Steven</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

