<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding Brain Imaging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/05/07/understanding-brain-imaging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/05/07/understanding-brain-imaging/</link>
	<description>For a greater understanding of the encultured brain and body...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:12:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scarsarestories</title>
		<link>http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/05/07/understanding-brain-imaging/#comment-12078</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scarsarestories]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 17:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neuroanthropology.wordpress.com/?p=317#comment-12078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you familiar with the book &quot;Picturing Personhood&quot; by Joseph Dumit?  It provides a strong critique of fMRI imaging, some of the pitfalls being that among participants from, say, a &quot;control group&quot; and a &quot;depressed group&quot;, contradictory data from the brain scans of members of each group is simply removed from the final &quot;image&quot;, often participants are comprised solely of white males, and there is huge disagreement between the mathematicians that create the algorithms that turn the quantitative data produced by a scan into a qualitative coloured image.  Some people are calling these scans &quot;the new phrenology&quot;...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you familiar with the book &#8220;Picturing Personhood&#8221; by Joseph Dumit?  It provides a strong critique of fMRI imaging, some of the pitfalls being that among participants from, say, a &#8220;control group&#8221; and a &#8220;depressed group&#8221;, contradictory data from the brain scans of members of each group is simply removed from the final &#8220;image&#8221;, often participants are comprised solely of white males, and there is huge disagreement between the mathematicians that create the algorithms that turn the quantitative data produced by a scan into a qualitative coloured image.  Some people are calling these scans &#8220;the new phrenology&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaker nawasrah</title>
		<link>http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/05/07/understanding-brain-imaging/#comment-3421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shaker nawasrah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neuroanthropology.wordpress.com/?p=317#comment-3421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[very excellent]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very excellent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

