<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Craving money, chocolate and&#8230; justice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/04/21/craving-money-chocolate-and-justice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/04/21/craving-money-chocolate-and-justice/</link>
	<description>For a greater understanding of the encultured brain and body...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:12:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Girls gone guilty: Evolutionary psych on sex #2 &#171; Neuroanthropology</title>
		<link>http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/04/21/craving-money-chocolate-and-justice/#comment-2670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Girls gone guilty: Evolutionary psych on sex #2 &#171; Neuroanthropology]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neuroanthropology.wordpress.com/?p=244#comment-2670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] stereotyping) psychology research (for example, Bad brain science: Boobs caused subprime crisis and Craving money, chocolate and… justice). It&#8217;s hard to know sometimes whether to just laugh at the stuff or to cry, but when stories [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stereotyping) psychology research (for example, Bad brain science: Boobs caused subprime crisis and Craving money, chocolate and… justice). It&#8217;s hard to know sometimes whether to just laugh at the stuff or to cry, but when stories [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Kroner</title>
		<link>http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/04/21/craving-money-chocolate-and-justice/#comment-1374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Kroner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neuroanthropology.wordpress.com/?p=244#comment-1374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What seems clear is that there will be few or no simple mechanistic neurological explanations of concepts such as justice.   In another New York Times article, The Moral Instinct, 1/13/08 Steven Pinker cited Robert Trivers, who proposed that fairness could be viewed as originating from a suite of moral emotions. &quot;Sympathy prompts a person to offer the first favor, particularly to someone in need for whom it would go the furthest. Anger protects a person against cheaters who accept a favor without reciprocating, by impelling him to punish the ingrate or sever the relationship. Gratitude impels a beneficiary to reward those who helped him in the past. Guilt prompts a cheater in danger of being found out to repair the relationship by redressing the misdeed and advertising that he will behave better in the future.&quot;  Each of these emotions ties to different brain functions and are then mediated into behavior through individual experiences within a culture.  
As you note, generalizations about &quot;fairness&quot; as they relate to human nature remain elusive.  The topics are as challenging today as when Plato wrote his Republic.    
Jonathan Kroner, JD, MBA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What seems clear is that there will be few or no simple mechanistic neurological explanations of concepts such as justice.   In another New York Times article, The Moral Instinct, 1/13/08 Steven Pinker cited Robert Trivers, who proposed that fairness could be viewed as originating from a suite of moral emotions. &#8220;Sympathy prompts a person to offer the first favor, particularly to someone in need for whom it would go the furthest. Anger protects a person against cheaters who accept a favor without reciprocating, by impelling him to punish the ingrate or sever the relationship. Gratitude impels a beneficiary to reward those who helped him in the past. Guilt prompts a cheater in danger of being found out to repair the relationship by redressing the misdeed and advertising that he will behave better in the future.&#8221;  Each of these emotions ties to different brain functions and are then mediated into behavior through individual experiences within a culture.<br />
As you note, generalizations about &#8220;fairness&#8221; as they relate to human nature remain elusive.  The topics are as challenging today as when Plato wrote his Republic.<br />
Jonathan Kroner, JD, MBA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dlende</title>
		<link>http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/04/21/craving-money-chocolate-and-justice/#comment-1362</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dlende]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neuroanthropology.wordpress.com/?p=244#comment-1362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A great post, Greg.  With your discussion of social emotions, brain processing, and evolution, I am reminded of something Jim Rilling, neuroanthropologist at Emory, once said to me about trying to imagine 50 chimpanzees cooperating to sit down in a lecture hall and listen to someone speak.  Just won&#039;t happen, though adult males will cooperate to hunt.  And I agree with you, the basic biological design of these systems, even at the non-human level, is a lot more open than we normally think.  Mesolimbic dopamine does all sorts of things, from shaping attention to learning error, and is not simply a hard-wired pleasure circuit, as is often thrown out in both scientific and popular publications.

On a related note, I just found this interesting post from Natural Rationality on altruism and such, where Rilling&#039;s work is discussed: http://naturalrationality.blogspot.com/2007/06/altruism-research-program.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great post, Greg.  With your discussion of social emotions, brain processing, and evolution, I am reminded of something Jim Rilling, neuroanthropologist at Emory, once said to me about trying to imagine 50 chimpanzees cooperating to sit down in a lecture hall and listen to someone speak.  Just won&#8217;t happen, though adult males will cooperate to hunt.  And I agree with you, the basic biological design of these systems, even at the non-human level, is a lot more open than we normally think.  Mesolimbic dopamine does all sorts of things, from shaping attention to learning error, and is not simply a hard-wired pleasure circuit, as is often thrown out in both scientific and popular publications.</p>
<p>On a related note, I just found this interesting post from Natural Rationality on altruism and such, where Rilling&#8217;s work is discussed: <a href="http://naturalrationality.blogspot.com/2007/06/altruism-research-program.html" rel="nofollow">http://naturalrationality.blogspot.com/2007/06/altruism-research-program.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

