<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beyond Right and Left</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/02/09/beyond-right-and-left/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/02/09/beyond-right-and-left/</link>
	<description>For a greater understanding of the encultured brain and body...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:12:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rosenbaum</title>
		<link>http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/02/09/beyond-right-and-left/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Rosenbaum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neuroanthropology.wordpress.com/?p=96#comment-288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it was Mark Twain or maybe Will Rogers who said that the problem with common sense is that it isn&#039;t very common.

I think a lot of times it goes beyond the understanding of human nature to really wanting to look at downstream consequences of different plans and actions.  On the surface something like Marxism seems to make some sense, but we know that it creates an unworkable system because it ends up being contrary to individual interests.  But when that happens it leads to something else and to something else.  

As the expression goes, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.  

You might believe it&#039;s a good idea to have people of different races and ethnic backgrounds together.  However, you have to do it in a way that makes things better rather than worse.  Government fiat gets you mostly negatives with none of the positives.  If you bring people together around mutual goals and share self-interests things happen a lot faster.

Here&#039;s a possible analogy, a society is better formed by planting the seeds and letting things grow than trying to engineer utopia]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it was Mark Twain or maybe Will Rogers who said that the problem with common sense is that it isn&#8217;t very common.</p>
<p>I think a lot of times it goes beyond the understanding of human nature to really wanting to look at downstream consequences of different plans and actions.  On the surface something like Marxism seems to make some sense, but we know that it creates an unworkable system because it ends up being contrary to individual interests.  But when that happens it leads to something else and to something else.  </p>
<p>As the expression goes, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.  </p>
<p>You might believe it&#8217;s a good idea to have people of different races and ethnic backgrounds together.  However, you have to do it in a way that makes things better rather than worse.  Government fiat gets you mostly negatives with none of the positives.  If you bring people together around mutual goals and share self-interests things happen a lot faster.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a possible analogy, a society is better formed by planting the seeds and letting things grow than trying to engineer utopia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

